Board Thread:Rights Interest/@comment-5619531-20141005224852/@comment-5619531-20141006002418

GodzillaFan1 wrote: Fatal Disease wrote:

GodzillaFan1 wrote: If I'm not mistaken, after your short hiatus, you got your admin right back, but not your bcrat rights? Welp, that's bullshit. I'm opposing just for that. Uh... what? It's kind of confusing, and petty to oppose just because someone didn't get their rights back. If I'm wrong let me know. I might change my vote. . Before the break Callie promised full return of the rights. After the break she said that there will be a delay in it, but granted me only my admin rights. Without any option, I just sat there and agreed with her decision. Because we had no active bureaucrats on the site, I argued that there needs to be an active bureaucrat--she was bordering to a point of inactivity in my eyes, and only came on because of the chat trial, iirc.

Then an issue rose up back in August that made me panic, and she cuts off the promise of me regaining my rights completely and says I have to re-apply for this right. It wasn't because I was panicking, it was because that she didn't want to look biased and give a friend his rights back.

Since we were head butting each conversation because I brought this up many times, and that I complained until Xelrog said to chill, I waited till I felt completely ready to re-apply. When I did, I was hesitant because Callie said that there were two admins, and SG said that this wiki is a "dead wiki".

So, I didn't agree with Callie that I needed only the admin rights; I didn't agree with her on what she was putting the wiki through by letting her be the only "active" bureaucrat, until she asked Xelrog to request the right.

Does that explain the situation better?