Board Thread:Rights Interest/@comment-5619531-20141005224852/@comment-25393922-20141009005157

Fatal Disease wrote: Alright. I'm gonna give my word on this.

When you forced me on my break I did ask you to give me a promise that my rights will be returned on both wikis. You made the promise, and I remember fighting about it with you several times. Now your word is going to change now and you're going to say that "Oh, I never made a promise to you."? I do remember that you discussed this with Skelly and you were going to make a delay, or whatever. But I do remember that you said that I will get a guarantee for my rights on both wikis before my forced break. But oh well, I know that you can't have anything in life (including the internet). And it did took me a long time to learn that.

Two. You had the option to rollback or undo my my edit on rules, and discuss them with me. You had the option to bring this "issue" of updating rules to benefit the wiki to me, rather than let it slide and use it as a petty oppose reason, Callie. It's not really what a bureaucrat should do if one thinks something should be done, imo. But I will let you know this: all rule updates I did when I felt I was the only crat here was for organization, certain rules needed to follow the organization process, and a rule needed to be updated very badly. And this is a comment may count in this refute, but you're not really pure on the "stuff under our noses" issue. You've promoted users to rollback before our current right system. I did take my reaction out-of-bounds, yelled at you, and undid my demotion because I felt like shit; but I still feel that promoting Megafan or Godofmemez to rollback was not within our privileges to both of us. Another thing was that you made Sonic.exe pastas blacklisted without a discussion with the admins (which was the whole purpose why I voted neutral on your bureaucrat app here).

My reaction at the time about me panicking about a right was because you randomly went from one topic to another (which you usually do). I was panicking about another issue where I asked for help (and when I mean help I mean talk it through), but you weren't there to listen to me like a friend should and you changed it to a topic where I could panic even more with my condition at the time--it does lead back the promise issue. Granted, I had a lot of panics in the past, but I don't have them a lot anymore like I used to back in June-August.

You can correct me on this, but I don't recall asking you to give me a biased on a vote. I remember fighting over a pre-bureaucrat app I asked you to critique on (since you did that to a shitload of people at the time, and because of the promise issue at the time). Near the end of the fight you said "You know what. Post it. I'm not going to be biased at all." Which made me halt and wait some more, and respect this opinion. But it doesn't mean I won't refute. But never did I ask you to give me a biased support because I felt you owe me. I did feel like you owed me back then, because I was so angry, but even with my mind I would never ask that. It's stupid to ask a friend to do that to please them. You can check the deleted revisions on both of our talk pages on Calliessandbox before you moved to Steam Phoenix (unless if it was a chat issue?).

I never did misunderstood Xelrog on your talk page. I knew that Xelrog is going to be on here for the time being. May I say that I didn't apply for this because of my wants; I applied because the site needed it. You somewhat agreed the exact thing that I said on this app we have three bureaucrats that present the wiki physically, while there is one that represents the site mentally—another one lurks around because there is nothing to do... With that, and noticing how Xelrog seems to be close as a community leader, I jumped in and applied.

And I'm going to ask you that do you know what happened to this wiki? This wiki isn't like it was where bureaucrats jump in and say, "Hey. This should be a rule. I'm gonna discuss it," or "Hey. A rule needs to be updated, I'm gonna update it." Users vote, and bureaucrats get the final say. What with your final sentence, I don't feel comfortable with you having the power to act and implement unchecked can be where three active or semi-active bureaucrats are needed. No, you mentioned that you wanted your rights back in a blog post. I haven't changed my word at all. And I brought up the issue of not talking to anyone else with you and you should've known at the time with Meta when he was pulling the same stunt. It was also very much agreed upon at the time I blacklisted Sonic.exe pastas that they were overflowing and needed to be rid of.

Also, by the way, I make noticiable changes in my behavior when I'm given the proper criticism.

And yeah, you said you would prefer the bias. You screamed and yelled about it. As I mentioned, it was one of our chat private messages. Frankly, I knew you were going to have a response to this, Fatal, cheap shots at my abilities in defense of your own included, and thought about not even responding back here. You can keep arguing all you want, but my opinion sticks. I've said my piece.