Board Thread:Site News and Announcements/@comment-24486926-20131127040859/@comment-24486926-20131127193733

Rickomarow wrote: (sigh) Fine, I'm sorry for snapping in the second post, I can't control myself, simple as that.

But, once again, I will NOT remove the "Death" category from articles and I will NOT refrain for using it, mark my words, I'm not here to obey non-sensial and idiotic rules, and I swear, if the idea of this thread don't change, expect future and quick departure, how am I going to continue my series if I can't have death?

I repeat, future and quick departure, I'll leave a message saying why I am leaving and criticizing HARDLY the state of the wiki.

I might come back, BUT ONLY IF THESE RULES DISSAPEAR,   and if you want to prove you're actually a friend, atleast to me, follow what I say, and you'll see, you will not only satisfy me, but also, you will satisfy    ALOT of other people.

"The client is always right." Can I at least clarify what I'm trying to do? I'm simply saying, the Death category the way we've used it is just too broad. I'm not saying "Don't have Death." I'm saying don't add it to the category because under that simple premise, the category will grow too big for easy tracking by normal users who use categories rather than the "Random Page" button and stuff.

Almost every pasta has death; having a category for it is like having a creepypasta category, it's redundant. You can kill off as many characters as you want, it's just that the category makes it redundant so we don't need to add it.

Now, if it's going to be a problem, why not just split it into sub-categories, if nothing else? Such as murder, suicide, natural accidents, etc?

As far as the rules, there are certain rules I can lighten up on, because they're no longer an issue. Sonic.exe, though, will have to stay. I'm sorry, but original works are still being overshadowed there. This is a wiki for spin-offs, but isn't there a fine line? Do we not have the right to say "Ok, stop with these, they're becoming an issue."? On top of that, you'll notice I repetitively mentioned a loophole in the rule where if they thought they could do good enough they could use Deletion Appeal after posting it elsewhere for admin review.

I've been trying Rick, I've been trying hard. It isn't easy to balance. I want this to be a free wiki just as much as you, but at the same time, I don't want this wiki to be considered the Creepypasta Wiki's prom night dumpster baby. I don't want a second CP wiki, I just want this one to get better, so that more people will come. Don't think for a second I haven't sat there and worried that I might be overstepping bounds, because I have.