Board Thread:Site News and Announcements/@comment-24977230-20131107202649/@comment-24977230-20131108145017

CalasanX wrote: There will still be a number of them made, but time will be given to play catch up. Until then, please take your time to examine the newer rules.

The rules are getting updated, and getting a massive overhaul to keep the wiki up to date, especially with the main wiki treading 15000 yards away from us and taking up new bans, unbanning things, or even just sending spin-offs here at random. Hundreds get deleted from that wiki everyday, and around 10% is spin-offs. Adding that up, the small number of pages we get are still alot, and alot don't pass Quality Standards due to the abysmal formatting and things like that. The rules were severely outdated, encrusted with a number of not-so-okay loopholes (and some still are,) and in desperate need of revision.

Many things still have to be done. We aren't trying to rush (I'm not.) but, getting the wiki up to date is the most important thing we can do right now. It would greatly increase Quality Control, looks, and the general fun of the wiki.

In actuality though, I haven't too many people complain about the new rules being set into place, other than the "Blacklisted Subject" rule, which so far there are only a few cliches and a single pasta spin-off. Rules will continue to be revised and updated, though you can be assured that many will be opened for community discussion, on top of single-admin action, or multi-admin action.

Trust me on that. ' Have I failed you yet? ' :) Hehe, so far not. I just wanted to say my thing about these rules, but I'm glad you told me this. I made it clear that I'm not against new rules, it's just a whole pile of them at one time, at a sudden moment. But hey, you have calmed me down. Thanks!