User talk:Princess Callie

Please contact me here or here.

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

'''Here to rant or express your ever growing hatred of me? Click here.'''

Here to rant about a deletion? Click here.

Welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave a message, but just remember a few simple things:

1. From here on in, I need to keep it organized. If you have a message for me that doesn't pertain to a subject already posted, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE leave a new message with a section headline.

2. Don't judge, don't be disrespectful, don't spam, don't impersonate.

3. Follow Site Rules. My talk page is part of the site, after all.

5. Remember to sign your posts with four tildes ( ~ ).

Bot Issues
Hey Callie

I noticed that the series catagory for all of my stories were taken off even though they are all apart of my Encounter journal entry series.

is there something I should do to make sure this doesn't happen again?\

Because thuis isn't the first time catagories that are accurate have been removed for no good reason.

This has really become an issue and it needs to be fixed.

Let me know what should be done whenever you can.

The Unlucky Researcher (talk) 17:56, April 28, 2014 (UTC)

Re:
Thanks for letting me know

The Unlucky Researcher (talk) 18:01, April 28, 2014 (UTC)

Dyers Eve
> 20:56, May 2, 2014‎ Princess Callie (talk | contribs | block)‎ m. . (86,034 bytes) (-31)‎. . (Undo revision 33675 by Fatal Disease (talk) Classics and SR don't need to go together.)

Why not? This wiki is similar to CPW in many ways; there are some stories on CPW, like Ted the Caver that's in both categories. So, why not let them be in both categories? There's no rule saying that they are not conflicting categories, unless if it's unwritten. And, I know you're probably going to say "The Classics category is in the Suggested Reading category, so it automatically conflicts." On the contrary, CPW's Classic's category is in Suggested Reading, as well. It's for articles that constructed the wiki/founded each article. While our category merely says that it founded the wiki, rather than saying that it shouldn't be in suggested reading. So, just pointing that out that there's a flaw in this rule - it's unwritten and the category has some flaws. It should only be for articles within the first six months of this wiki's creation, and any articles created before the wiki's creation. Just pointing that out. Do you hear that? That's the grape roaring  02:50, May 3, 2014 (UTC)
 * Meh. I just needed the clarification on this and why it hasn't been established into the rules. It's just a simple (FOR ADMINS) section, where I can write it down. I will also rollback the undo's that I have done too. Do you hear that? That's the grape roaring  03:05, May 3, 2014 (UTC)


 *  Whoops. I see that you already established that rule. lel. Thanks for doing that for me. And hot damn, the formatting on my talk page looks like a shitstorm just occurred. Fuck the siggy fuck the talk

Did I miss something? I, Da Cashman (talk) 01:18, May 4, 2014 (UTC)

RE:Vengeance
Fixed. Any more problems, tell me.

 Jacket Mike | Message this nice person. 21:04, May 3, 2014 (UTC)